Litteratur Open dialogue

Sebastian von Peter et al. 2021: Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach uses the following referances of Open dialogue:

• Aaltonen, J., Seikkula, J., and Lehtinen, K.(2011). The Comprehensive Open-DialogueApproach in Western Lapland: I. The Incidence of Non-affective Psychosis andProdromal States.Psychosis3, 179–191. doi:10.1080/17522439.2011.601750

• Alanen, Y. O. (2009). Towards a More Humanistic Psychiatry: Development ofNeed-adapted Treatment of Schizophrenia Group Psychoses.Psychosis1 (2),156–166. doi:10.1080/17522430902795667

• Alvarez-Monjaras, M., Lotmore, M., and Pilling, S. (2021).“Community MentalHealth Fidelity Scale (COM-FIDE): ODDESSI Pilot Outcomes,”in3rd Meetingof the International Open Dialogue Research Collaboration–Book of Abstracts.Editors R. Pocobello and F. Camilli (Italy: Institute of Cognitive Sciences andTechnologies, National Research Council), 12.

• Bergstøm, T., Seikkula, J., Holma, J., Mäki, P., and Köngäs-Saviaro, P. (2019). How Do People Talk Decades Later about Their Crisis that We Call Psychosis? AQualitative Study of the Personal Meaning-Making Process.Psychosis11 (2),105–115. doi:10.1080/17522439.2019.1603320

• Bergstrøm, T., Alakare, B., Aaltonen, J., Mäki, P., Köngäs-Saviaro, P., Taskila, J. J.,et al. (2017). The Long-Term Use of Psychiatric Services within the OpenDialogue Treatment System after First-Episode Psychosis.Psychosis9, 310–321.doi:10.1080/17522439.2017.1344295

• Bergstrøm, T., Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., Mäki, P., Köngäs-Saviaro, P., Taskila, J. J.,et al. (2018). The Family-Oriented Open Dialogue Approach in the Treatmentof First-Episode Psychosis: Nineteen-Year Outcomes.Psychiatry Res.270,168–175. doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2018.09.039

• Bergström,T.,Seikkula,J.,Holma,J.,Köngäs-Saviaro,P.,Taskila,J.J.,andAlakare, B. (2021). Retrospective Experiences of First-Episode PsychosisTreatment Under Open Dialogue-Based Services: A Qualitative Study.Community Ment. Health J.Epub ahead of print. doi:10.1007/s10597-021-00895-6

• Borchers, P. (2014). Issues like This Have an Impact: The Need-Adapted Treatment ofPsychosis and the Psychiatrist’s Inner Dialogue. Jyväskylä studies in education,psychology and Social Research.Available at: https://jyx.jyu.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/44396/978-951-39-5861-9_vaitos25102014.pdf?sequence#1 (AccessedOctober 10, 2021)

• Bracken, P., Thomas, P., Timimi, S., Asen, E., Behr, G., Beuster, C., et al. (2012).Psychiatry Beyond the Current Paradigm.Br. J. Psychiatry201 (6), 430–434.doi:10.1192/bjp.bp.112.109447

• Seikkula, J. (2019). Psychosis Is Not Illness but a Survival Strategy in Severe Stress:A Proposal for an Addition to a Phenomenological Point of View.Psychopathology52, 143–150. doi:10.1159/000500162

• Seikkula, J., and Trimble, D. (2005). Healing Elements of TherapeuticConversation: Dialogue as an Embodiment of Love.Fam. Process.44,461–475. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.2005.00072.x

• Seikkula, J., Aaltonen, J., Alakare, B., Haarakangas, K., Keränen, J., and Lehtinen, K.(2006). Five-Year Experience of First-Episode Nonaffective Psychosis in Open-Dialogue Approach: Treatment Principles, Follow-Up Outcomes, and Two CaseStudies.Psychotherapy Res.16 (2), 214–228. doi:10.1080/10503300500268490

• Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., and Aaltonen, J. (2001). Open Dialogue in Psychosis I: AnIntroduction and Case Illustration.J. Constr Psychol.14 (4), 247–265.doi:10.1080/107205301750433397

• Seikkula, J., Alakare, B., and Aaltonen, J. (2011). The Comprehensive Open-Dialogue Approach in Western Lapland: II. Long-Term Stability of AcutePsychosis Outcomes in Advanced Community Care.Psychosis3, 192–204.doi:10.1080/17522439.2011.595819

• Seikkula, J. (2008). Inner and Outer Voices in the Present Moment of Family andNetwork Therapy.J. Fam. Ther.30 (4), 478–491. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2008.00439.x

• Steingard, S. (2020). A Conversation with Nev Jones. Mad in America. Available at:https://www.madinamerica.com/2020/09/a-conversation-with-nev-jones/(Accessed September 13, 2021).Valtanen, K. (2019). The Psychiatrist’s Role in Implementing an Open DialogueModel of Care.Aust. N. Z. J. Fam. Ther.40 (3), 319–329. doi:10.1002/anzf.1382

• von Peter, S., Aderhold, V., Cubellis, L., Bergström, T., Stastny, P., Seikkula, J., et al.(2019). Open Dialogue as a Human Rights-Aligned Approach.Front.Psychiatry10, 387. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00387

• Von Peter, S., Aderhold, V., and Heumann, K. (n d).“Open Dialogue in German Psychiatric Care–Efforts, Challenges and Obstacles,”in3rd Meeting of theInternational Open Dialogue Research Collaboration–Book of Abstracts.Editors R. Pocobello and F. Camilli (Italy: Institute of Cognitive Sciencesand Technologies, National Research Council).

• Von Peter, S., and Zinkler, M. (2021). Coping with Criticism and Embracing Change-Further Reflexions on the Debate on a Mental Health Care Systemwithout Coercion.Laws10 (2), 22. doi:10.3390/laws10020022WHO (2021).

• Guidance on Community Mental Health Services: Promoting Person-Centred and Rights-Based Approaches. Geneva: World Health Organization.Availableat:https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240025707(Accessed September 13, 2021).
  
  (PDF) Dialogue as a Response to the Psychiatrization of Society? Potentials of the Open Dialogue Approach. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357240304_Dialogue_as_a_Response_to_the_Psychiatrization_of_Society_Potentials_of_the_Open_Dialogue_Approach [accessed Dec 29 2021].